Vasily Sadonin Biography

Well, this can be seen for example by the number of Zareferendum registered on the site.

Or in the quantity and quality of some channels on YouTube, such as Belrusinfo. Many publics in VK and their streams every day and the publication of photographs from all over Russia in these publics that show their activities. Frequent reports on the activities of GCD in their publics. What can I say, the number of collected signatures for the investigation of the collapse of the USSR show the number of NOD participants, or sympathy for them.

And there is no need to talk about the decline of the GCD, but on the contrary, even growth. But with the growth of the left movement, you can soon observe the decline of the NOD. We can say that young patriots are most often in the left movement. Well, again. Mikhail Sovetsky in the video Rolike “When Russia is freed and what to do next” said “If Russia is not freed after a year, then what to do next is incomprehensible.” But the fact that for ordinary participants in the NODs, mainly those who were really born there and managed to live in it, the USSR is their homeland and want to restore it at least within the framework of the Union State between Russia and Belarusia.

I read the NOD information base on the Rusnod website, and there is nothing to do with socialism and communism. What is incomprehensible then. NOD, this is a bourgeois movement for the formation of the national bourgeoisie. Of course, the national state implies the state with the national bourgeoisie. And if a foreign bourgeoisie appears as a type, then the people go to kick it from the authorities and put the bourgeois that are behind the “noun” the nation.

NOD refers to this conference. NOD yes, says that "we will change the two chapters of the Constitution and heal." But there is but, in order to live normally, then you need to start fighting for improving life, that is, it will switch to the class struggle. What is Mikhail Soviet in his video roller “Who are the right and left? The simplest language. " That the type needs to be released from the beginning of Russia, but under the “liberation” of Russia we seemed to have figured out, and then to begin a peaceful social-democratic language, to persuade the national bourgeois so that they give us social guarantees.

I am against the position of "persuading". I am for specific actions that are guaranteed to give social guarantees and a socialist revolution. But Fedorov will easily agree with Shiza here. Fedorov’s constant uncertainty, when I was an active participant in the NOD, is still scary. Only Sadonin is strange in the analogy, such as comparing compliance with the laws of bourgeois Russia, although “occupied” and compliance with the laws of the fascist Germany on the occupied part of the USSR.

The strange thing is that the occupation is directly, so to speak, the socialist state and the occupation of economic ... which is pancake. I love Lenin since the year. Since he freed Russia from capitalists and landowners and showed the way to the whole world. And with a small discussion with the participants in the GCD, will they agree with V. Stalin an anti -revolutionary?

Her ... Those participants in the GCD who know the biography of Stalin will say that he is a revolutionary for the world revolution, the point that is ready to support communist organizations in other countries. For someone who is familiar with the biography of Lenin and Stalin, it will agree that there is practically no difference between Lenin and Stalin. Very great people are.

And besides, these quotes of Stalin are the most popular. There are many people with idealistic manners, such as older generations, who are over 50 years old. To which even studies in the USSR did not help the felts to consolidate the dialectical understanding of the world, the felts did not explain to them what dialectics is and how to use it. And they continue to idealistically and metaphysically perceive the world.

Therefore, we see the idealization of Putin and Stalin. Of course, where Michael the Soviet carried nonsense is still not clear. He with the proofs easily walking in every video explains the situation in Russia and this situation is explained from the bourgeois point of view and combine it from a class point of view, it is stupid. It feels like you did not watch a single video of his video.

I agree with Sadoninn that the NOD is a false path. In this superficial analysis, I simply correct some of its jambs regarding the Nod. And in fact, I consider this video clock a worthy answer to Mikhail Sovetsky, but he does not refute the theses of the NOD, namely Russia is not a sovereign country, even though the approach in it is dialectical. Now we are waiting for the reaction of Mikhail Sovetsky: to show completely.