Stanislav Smagin Biography

He studied at a university at the Faculty of Political Science and became a political scientist - a rare case of a political scientist in a diploma, and not just self -repayment. He also became a publicist - since childhood there was a habit, a desire to write. He worked as an editor of several portals and publications-both political and others, but they must admit, tried to give a certain socio-political sound.

I am the author of three books, notes about the Donbass and Ukraine-“Where is my people”, “Gorky-live thoughts. What will happen to Russia? And from what time? Moreover, in relation to Donbass, this understanding was even more distinct than in relation to Crimea, where I had not been then. My native Rostov region and Donbass are a historically single organism, both in geographical, and socio-economic, and logistics terms.

In the late Soviet years, from Rostov to Donetsk, they went on weekends by bus for groceries, since here the supply of a quota of the Ukrainian SSR was more abundant. In M, another factor appeared. When Crimea and Sevastopol returned to Russia, I, like everyone else, had euphoria. But when, for certain reasons, the Russian Donbass remained overboard, which rose to fight rallies of tens of thousands of people and militia, armed with shovels, which, with all due respect to the Crimeans, gave and continues to pay for his choice of incomparably large bloody fee ...

For me it was some kind of terrible personal challenge and insulting. As if in my eyes they were offended, offended, humiliated my family member. Therefore, all eight years of the day did not pass so that I did not say something or write about the Donbass and Ukraine. He was repeatedly in Donetsk and Lugansk, helped them with everything he could according to the journalistic, political, humanitarian, volunteer lines, wrote articles and books, performed on Russian TV what others were afraid to speak or embarrassed.

And of course, he was happy when the Russian government, albeit with a great delay, literally at the last moment of historical capabilities, first recognized the DPR and the LPR, and then began to solve the issue of their safety, sovereignty, and at the same time the Ukrainian issue as a whole. Probably, ending my triumphantly and lightning speed, I would not participate in it.

Unless like a journalist writing victorious material from Khreshchatyk. But things went more complicated and more complicated, and after raisins with Balaklai, I realized that I had to go. It would be stupid and arrogant to say that they will not cope without me. Rather, I just did not have the strength to be in the rear and call it “war on the information front”.

Therefore, thanks to the Russian Union public organization and personally its leader Alexei Kochetkov, I ended up in a Mmar police battalion of the DPR, after I was transferred to the battalion and now there is a transitional period to the Russian army. Now I have just been transferred to the y battalion, he is adjacent to my old unit. This separatism was first brought to the stage of Ukraine not Russia, then “Ukraine is anti-Russia”, and now “either Ukraine or Russia”.

Carefully fed by the external enemies of Russia and, unfortunately, abundantly fertilized by the plumbing national policy of the Bolsheviks, and then the policy of the post-Soviet ruling class of the Russian Federation, which built Ukrainian and any other foreign policy, based on precisely from class and private brows. As a result, we had a monster near our side, appropriating the Russian lands, depressing and massively killing Russian people, considering Russia to be its deadly enemy and used by “our Western partners” not only as military and geopolitical, but also as a civilizational, I would say, psychological weapons of the wounding and destruction of Russia.

It is much easier when the enemy is initially different, very different from you, like Baltic states, Americans, Japanese. But it is unbearable when this is actually your reflection, albeit in a crooked mirror ... - What are the chances of the Armed Forces in revenge? And how long, in your opinion, a special military operation can last? On the one hand, we have a common military school and, in general, as I said, they are our reflection.

The same thought sounded in the sensational film “The Best of Hell” - “... they think how we are.” And the whole film is about that. On the other hand, they are also well trained and directed by NATO instructors and specialists, competent and qualified people who know how to think non -standard. In addition, their terrible “bonus” is that the Kiev Supreme leadership is not particularly considered losses.

Tell us about them. And with the barbaric shelling of Donetsk, which can not even be called indiscriminate, because they are emphasized against the civilian population, I constantly come across. Just on the day of my arrival at the service, on September 19, as a result of shelling on the square of the Baku commissars in the Kuibyshevsky district - 13 dead civilians, of which two children.

For them, a war for the right to also colonize the Russian lands and oppress them, and even grow new lands and subjects.For our cacophony of ideas: “we are proud-free-loving” and “we want to Europe and beautiful panties”, “Moskali, lag behind us” and “We will panic at the expense of the Muscovites”-rural thinking with a white hut and ambitious fruiting trees as the center of the universe-and the mocking imperialism with Ukraine as a leader at least eastern Europe and at least eastern Europe and Territorial growths are almost to the Urals.

All this is clothed in a completely cannibalistic uniform, before which military crimes of the Great Patriotic War are also fading. And the Bandera of the new generation even flaunt their inhumanity. The tragic problem is that a significant part of Ukrainian citizens sincerely consider their struggle to be domestic, fair, national-liberation. After all, they were attacked by the previous eight years in the Donbass, Odessa Khatyn, “Moskalyaka on Gilyak”, threats to create a “dirty” bomb and everything else, as it were, is taken out of the brackets and as a prerequisite for our actions is not considered by them.

And it is precisely the completely sincere feelings of the struggle for a just cause and patriotism, and not just coercion and psychotropic substances. And since the Ukrainians are broken, “reflated”, but initially, and in some ways, Russian people are still able to fight. The new “firmware” puts on their struggle, I repeat, in the cannibalistic uniform. And one more problem.

Some people who consider themselves left -handed call them the puffing of Russian and Ukrainian workers, beneficial only capitalists. And some, calling themselves Russian nationalists, suggest that the world backstage and conditional Zion-Mason were scorching two fraternal people. This, of course, is an extremely simplified, one -sided look. The conflict has objective, long -ripened reasons.

Ukrainian once could be considered an ethnic and cultural problem, over which Turgenev was also ironic with the pseudo-Ukrainian-in-law “Greek, Greek, Voropai” and about which Brodsky wrote angrily and vilely: “... you will wheeze, scratching the edge of the mattress, a line from Alexander, and not Brichyu Taras” and Brodsky, and Turgenev people are quite liberal Westernic views, which only emphasizes how much the separation of the Ukrainian principle from the Russian seemed ridiculous normal Russian people of any views.

Now it is a geopolitical, civilizational, ideological problem, fueled by the West. At the same time, we see that the Ukrainian regime leads adventurous personalities who, apparently, sincerely want to achieve victory over Russia, but clearly have patriotism in the first place in their list of priorities, being subordinate to the West and showing their readiness to achieve their goals to the last Ukrainian.

At the same time, they, of course, do not set any humanistic goals of savings in the Russian people, they have purely selfish motives, and for the sake of preventing victory in this Patriotic War, they are ready to burn at least all of us. Nothing is new under the moon - even during the Second World War, the most frank representatives of the Anglo -Saxon elite said that their rainbow dream - the last Russian soldier kills the last German and, exhausted, falls dead.

So now. They need Russia to lose and, completely bloodless, falling under open colonial control, possibly dissected and completely disarmed, always paid reparations, repented and dyed out. Including women. They say that the war is not a female face. What do you think, what is the place of a woman in the war? That the best help of a woman to her country is to be a faithful wife of a warrior and to educate sons as future warriors.

But the history of our country knows many cases when women had to do much more. Now Olga Kachura is “Cors”. Note that all known cases when women not only participate in the war, but also brightly, heroically manifest themselves, become famous throughout the country. And all of them occurred in the wars begun by the enemy, the war, when we defended our land and our people current events, because we also started not us, but Ukraine eight years ago.

That is, a woman in war is a sign of her righteous nature. The struggle of Armenia and Artsakh was fair, national, justified. But Pashinyan’s regime clearly ended up in the corridor of the possibilities created by external forces, and, probably, under the control of these very forces. As a result, on both sides of the situation were common moderators who led to its well -known result and continue to develop their success: the South Caucasus is completely under the control of these very external forces that compete with each other, but that Russia should be supplanted from the region.

Personally, I saw at least one person on the forefront. And within Russia, I know enough Armenians by blood, fully supporting our business. For example, my very close friend Vyacheslav Norluenian, a hot patriot and, by the way, a teacher of Russian literature. For a long time, at a very good level, he was engaged in rock music, recorded several albums. We wanted to make a song about the rebellious Donbass, I think we will still do it.Although the officials of Armenia, when I talked with them, from their diplomatic considerations even approached the parallels between Karabakh and Crimea very carefully.

So, the speaker of the parliament at the time of our conversation is still the vice speaker Alain Simonyan said that these are completely different situations, and to my clarifying question, whether this is that Crimea has fewer reasons for self-determination, hesitated and answered in the spirit of "there are no less, they are different." When I went to Stepanakert for the first time as part of a journalistic delegation, for me, in addition to the general deep sympathy for Armenia and its small heroic region, an additional circumstance that caused mental warmth was precisely the community of destinies with the Donbass.

I remember that at dinner with representatives of local authorities, I raised a toast to ensure that all the territories dreaming of self -determination were received by the fate that they strive for: Karabakh, Donbass, Kurdistan. On two of my colleagues from liberal publications, in the personal plan of quite pretty people, this phrase affected like an incense to hell.

Many, a lot in common. The next visit, a year ago, in the evening I walked along Stepanakertskaya Square, where photographs of children who died during the war of the year were posted on the stands. Young guys, mainly 18 -year -olds. In fact, a whole generation is knocked out. I never forget about them in Donetsk. Azerbaijan violated the boundaries of Armenia, and their Armed Forces are still in Armenia.

What do you think this can lead to? I wrote in the spring: “Washington, of course, will not push Armenia with an increase in the pro-Western component of its course, but Ayan needs a star-striped gentlemen in the most weakened form, without the right to vote and only if the Karabakh settlement according to the American scenario, which God will know what.” Now it is obvious that the West and Turkey, competing among themselves for the shares of the shares of the South Caucasus OJSC, would like to see Russia outside the number of shareholders, and Armenia and Azerbaijan are equally controlled by specialized assets, only Armenia is weak, humiliated and lost by France, and a certain part of the US elite has.

By the way, also with Serbia. If Trump was ready to resolve the Kosovo problem at least with some taking into account the position of Belgrade, now Washington, claiming to subordinate Serbs and Kosovars at the same time, wants to solve this problem almost exclusively at the Serbian account and in a humiliating form. Moreover, it is important for them to do this precisely with Vuchich in order to punish him for attempts to at least somehow maintain relations with Russia.

Unfortunately, the Caucasian policy of Russia had previously been quite slurred, with the basic principles of “and it will do” and “it will resolve”, and now it’s not even more so. Attention to the region has decreased and increases only when Türkiye, wanting to get something from Moscow, throws logs at the Armenian-Azerbaijani fire. But the very fact of this constant threat and the fact that the South Caucasus remains Russian underbuilding and a very important place for national interests, suggests that it is impossible to forget about it.

I hope that Russia will fully return here as a guarantor of peace and stability. Although too many against. Putin, President of Azerbaijan I. Aliyev and Prime Minister of Armenia N.